pico

since unknown year (earliest usage recorded on this site was 1991)

more info

Users

Technology Timeline Graph

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

sceptreofjudah

frankwiles

otherchirps

brousch

beaugunderson

enki

trey

paltman

thraxil

iamteem

carljm

bitprophet

Josh

greyfade

karlstolley

madewulf

coderanger

Da_Nuke

westonruter

NX172

sceptreofjudah - 23 years

frankwiles - 7 years

otherchirps - 3 years

brousch - 10 years

beaugunderson - 7 years

enki - 2 years

trey - 16 years

paltman - 5 years

thraxil - 2 years

iamteem - 6 years

carljm - 7 years

bitprophet - 3 years

Josh - 3 years

greyfade - 5 years

karlstolley - 4 years

madewulf - 9 years

coderanger - 4 years

Da_Nuke - 7 years

westonruter - 6 years

NX172 - 5 years

sceptreofjudah

1991–

frankwiles

1993–1999

Like carljm, used it for years composing email in Pine.

brousch

1994–2003

Pine

1994–1996

1994–2000

1995–2010

1995–1996

1996–2000

1996–1997

1999–2005

Only ever used it for composing mail in pine.

iamteem

1999–2004

bitprophet

2000–2002

Used Pico on Linux or Unix distros which weren't sufficiently ra-ra about Free Software that they gave you Nano instead. Eventually learned enough vi(m) to give up the habit, thankfully.

2000–2002

2001–2005

2003–2006

2005–2008

On my Uni's ancient Solaris systems the options were pico or vi (no vim).

madewulf

2005–

Easier to understand than vi at first.

Da_Nuke

2007–

On my Linux class we used the commercial version of SUSE, which comes with Pico instead of Nano. It's a very average text editor with nothing special.

westonruter

2008–

When I got my MBP, I started using pico for simple text changes.

NX172

2009–

justinlilly

I think my first experience with pico was with pine sometime in the late 90's early 00's.